Supreme Court rules that failure to comply with doctor recommended procedure is medical abandonment

Philippine Shipping Update – Manning Industry

By:  Ruben Del Rosario, President, Del Rosario Pandiphil Inc., 26 January 2018 (Issue 2018/02)
Supreme Court rules that failure to comply with doctor recommended procedure is medical abandonment

During employment, the seafarer slipped and fell on his back.  He was referred to a shore doctor who initially diagnosed him with acute lumbago and recommended repatriation for further examination and treatment.
Upon further examination of the company-designated physician the seafarer was diagnosed with lumbosacral muscular spasm with mild spondylosis L3-L4.  In the interim, the seafarer was assessed with a grade “10” disability and was scheduled to undergo a bone scan.  Instead of appearing at the scheduled date of bone scan examination, the seafarer consulted his own doctor who determined him to be unfit to work as a seaman in any capacity.  Nevertheless, in the medical report of seafarer’s chosen doctor, it was also recommended that he undergo a bone scan and EMG-NCV to determine the exact problem of his lumbar spine which is consistent with the recommendation of the company-designated physician.
Armed with the assessment from his chosen doctor, the seafarer filed a complaint for full disability benefits with the Labor Arbiter.
The Labor Arbiter, on his own, determined that seafarer is suffering from a grade “6” disability in accordance with the POEA Schedule and based the award of benefits on said finding.  On the other hand, the NLRC awarded the maximum disability benefits on the reasoning that seafarer is already considered permanently and totally disabled as he can no longer resume his former work.  The ruling of the NLRC was affirmed by the Court of Appeals.
When the case reached the Supreme Court, the award of the Labor Arbiter was reinstated.
The Court noted that the seafarer was under medical treatment with the company-designated physician for 126 days.  Thereafter, the seafarer, while diagnosed with an interim disability assessment of grade “10”, was also advised to further undergo bone scan.  However, instead of returning for the recommended diagnosis and treatment, the seafarer opted to secure the opinion of his chosen physician who, although arriving at a finding of permanent total disability, nonetheless required seafarer to subject himself to further bone scan and EMG-NCV to determine the exact problem on his lumbar spine.  Instead of heeding the recommendations of his own doctor, the seafarer went on to file a complaint for disability benefits. In point of law, seafarer's filing of the case was premature.
The doctors were one in recommending that seafarer undergo at least a bone scan to determine his current condition while undergoing treatment, thus indicating that seafarer's condition needed further attention. In this regard, it was correct to argue that seafarer abandoned his treatment, as under the law and the POEA contract of the parties, the company physician is given up to 240 days to treat him. On the other hand, the fact that seafarer’s chosen doctor required the conduct of further tests on the seafarer is an admission that his diagnosis of permanent total disability is incomplete and inconclusive, and thus unreliable. It can only corroborate the company-designated physician's finding that further tests and treatment are required.
Nevertheless, the Court held that seafarer might have treated the company-designated physician's grade “10” temporary diagnosis as the final assessment of his condition, which prompted him to secure the opinion of his own doctor and thereafter file the case prematurely.  For this he cannot be completely blamed as he might have proceeded under the impression that he was being shortchanged. Given his position in the employment relation, his distrust for the company is not completely unwarranted.  As such, seafarer is entitled only to compensation equivalent to or commensurate with his injury as determined by the Labor Arbiter.
C.F. Sharp Crew Management, Inc., its President, and Gulf Energy Maritime vs. Noel Orbeta, G.R. No. 211111, September 25, 2017, First Division, Associate Justice Mariano Del Castillo, ponente

 2017 AsiaLaw Profiles:  Outstanding in Shipping, Maritime & Aviation; Recommended in Dispute Resolution  & Litigation, Insurance, Intellectual Property, Labour & Employment
“Del Rosario & Del Rosario is more or less unrivalled when it comes to maritime work in the Philippines” from Asia-Pacific, The Legal 500, 2014, p. 497
“Del Rosario & Del Rosario is often first port of call for employment law within the maritime industry, where it represents shipowners, agents, insurers and port owners.” Asia-Pacific, The Legal 500, 2014, p. 494
“Offers comprehensive shipping expertise. Maintains an excellent reputation for representing P&I firms and handling collision and crew casualties.  A strong team that is well known in the market.” Chambers Asia Pacific, 2014 p. 949
This publication aims to provide commentary on issues affecting the manning industry, analysis of recent cases and updates on legislation.  It is meant to be brief and is not intended to be legal advice.  To subscribe or for further information, please email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .




Holiday Notice:  

In view of national holidays in the Philippines, our offices will be closed on following days –

Tuesday 5 February 2019, to re-open on Wednesday 6 February 2019;

Monday 25 February 2019, to re-open on Tuesday  26 February 2019.

Emails will be closely monitored but for urgent matters, please call our 24/7 mobile                          

63 917 830 8384

The Asia Business Law Journal has named Managing Partners Arturo Del Rosario, Jr. and Ruben Del Rosario and Senior Partner Joseph Rebano as one of the Philippines Top 100 Lawyers in their recently published list.

The Top 100 list of lawyers can be accessed as follows:



DelRosarioLaw welcomes Ruben Jose G. Del Rosario Jr., as a Junior Associate of the firm. He is a 2011 Bachelor of Science in Management, Major in Legal Management graduate of Ateneo de Manila and a 2017 Bachelor of Laws graduate of San Beda College - Alabang.


Partner Charles Dela Cruz spoke on "Nuances of Retirement Law in the Philippines" at the 2nd HR Compliance Conference held on September 25-26, 2018 at SMX Aura Convention in Bonifacio Global City.


Partners Charles Dela Cruz and Herbert Tria spoke on “Current Crew Claims Handling Issues related to the Data Privacy Act” at the 7th Annual Magsaysay Shipping and Logistics’ Marine Insurance Seminar held on 21 September 2018 at Robert Hall, Times Plaza Building, Manila.


DelRosarioLaw Senior Partner Charles Jay Dela Cruz was elected as member of the Board of Trustees of the Philippine Bar Association (PBA) for the term 2018-2019.



  • IRR Seafarer's Protection Act
  • Seafarers Protection Act
  • ORDINANCE No. 28 Series of 2015 Zambales, Philippines
  • NLRC MEMO on 3rd Doctor
  • NLRC Rules of Procedure 2011
  • Standard Terms and Conditions of Del Rosario Law
  • POEA SEC - 2010 Amendments
  • POEA Memorandum Circular No. 10 Series of 2010
  • Governing Board Resolution No. 09 Series of 2010

Go to downloads page...